sonship
We have endeavord the issue and figured out, that the status is not automaticially sexual. So, we read about “sons of Elohim” and “sons of prophets”. Both terms have differing purposes. Whilst “sons of Elohim” r both, angels and leading humans, “sons of prophets” just r talmidim of a prophet and not createt by a prophet.
Two meanings of the same word “bnay”. What about the Mashiakh?
If it is correctely translatet, it says he was “the first- born before all creation”. This meaneth he was the first creature at all. To be “born”, in this case, is not the biological way. No, it stands for “being createt”. And, if Yeshua was the “workmaster of creation”, he was an overseer, leading the creation in the name of El who “spoke, and see, there it stood”. The Creator still is El, but the executive was done by angels who´s leader was the Mashiakh. So, which sonship has the Mashiakh?
Good question at all! Well, I try to explain it:
Yeshua is a “son of El” similar to the angels. But, not the same way like them. The position of the Mashiakh is unic. There is no real comparison possible. Thereof, how can we know more about his position and works?
I recomment the book Yashar (Joshua 10: 13 and 2. Sam 1: 18), translatet in German by Holger Grimme eng ISBN-10: 3-938159-33-2 ger ISBN-13: 9783938159330
MUV
muv@mongolbible.com and “Fallen angels and the orgines of evil”, summit university press Gardiner, Montana by Elisabeth Claire Prophet.
www.summituniversitypress.com
info@summituniversitypress
fax 0014068489555
phone 0014689500 For direct insight: http://www.summituniversitypress.com/books/fallen-angels.html
| 